Platform scores

Choose the channel on evidence, not habit

RankStack compares eight marketing platforms against your brief on audience fit, intent fit, content-format fit, reach and cost efficiency — then recommends a pairing rather than a single channel.

What is compared

PlatformReachCost efficiencyWhere it earns its place
Google Search9570Highest intent, slowest to build, compounding once it lands.
YouTube9055Search-driven like Google, but demands sustained video production.
LinkedIn6560Strong for B2B and professional services; weak for consumer topics.
Pinterest6070Visual planning topics with long content life.
TikTok8565Fast reach, short content life, weak purchase intent.
Facebook7555Groups and local audiences outperform pages.
Email4590Smallest reach, highest conversion, and the only audience you own.
Specialist communities4085Forums, Slack groups and subreddits: small, high-trust, easily overdone.
Marketplaces (Etsy, Amazon, Gumroad, app stores)7070Buyers already searching for products like yours; listings rank inside the marketplace, and fees apply.

Reach and cost efficiency are starting positions, not measurements. They are editable, and once your workspace holds enough real performance data the scoring blends the measured result in.

Why a pairing

One platform brings new people in; another keeps the audience you have already earned. Search plus email, or YouTube plus an interactive tool, will usually outperform any single channel pursued alone.

RankStack therefore recommends a primary acquisition platform and a secondary owned channel, and shows the reasoning for both.

Learning from what happened

Until a workspace holds enough genuine traffic, lead and revenue data, the comparison stays labelled as a starting position. Past that threshold, measured revenue per channel is weighted at 60% against the default scoring.

Start with one project

Create a workspace, add the domain you want to grow, and record the first piece of evidence.

Create your workspace